Member Login - Account - Logout

Science and Technology Australia
  • Home
  • About STA
    • Who is STA?
    • Our history
    • Alliances and Partnerships
    • Board and Executive
    • Governance
    • Work for us
    • Reconciliation Action Plan
    • Policy Vision
    • Policy Wins
  • News and Publications
    • Latest news
    • Reports and publications
  • Our Programs
    • Science Meets Parliament
    • Parliamentary Friends of Science
    • Superstars of STEM
    • Science Policy Fellows Alumni
    • Super STEM communicator workshop
    • STEM Ambassadors
  • Events
    • Science Meets Parliament 2023
  • Membership
    • Our Members
    • Why be a member?
    • Member Benefits Program
    • Join STA
    • Member How-to Guides
    • Login to member portal
    • Register for member portal
  • Contact
    • Media
  • Home
  • About STA
    • Who is STA?
    • Our history
    • Alliances and Partnerships
    • Board and Executive
    • Governance
    • Work for us
    • Reconciliation Action Plan
    • Policy Vision
    • Policy Wins
  • News and Publications
    • Latest news
    • Reports and publications
  • Our Programs
    • Science Meets Parliament
    • Parliamentary Friends of Science
    • Superstars of STEM
    • Science Policy Fellows Alumni
    • Super STEM communicator workshop
    • STEM Ambassadors
  • Events
    • Science Meets Parliament 2023
  • Membership
    • Our Members
    • Why be a member?
    • Member Benefits Program
    • Join STA
    • Member How-to Guides
    • Login to member portal
    • Register for member portal
  • Contact
    • Media
16 September 2019

Separation of Science and the State

Brainstorming Word Meaning Creative Thinking And Ideas

There’s been a concerted effort over the last few months to point out that science isn’t perfect.

The National Party’s Federal Council has just endorsed a motion to establish a watchdog, a national scientific quality assurance agency –  a push led by federal MP George Christensen.

Nationals Senator Matt Canavan previously backed the call by the Queensland Liberal Party for an “Office of Science Quality Assurance” to review scientific reports before they are handed to government. It’s important to note there was no call for a review of all reports handed to government, only scientific ones.

We agree that science isn’t perfect, but it is a set of transparent methods for getting at the truth, and that’s the point. Imperfection and a desire for constant growth and improvement is the very thing that drives scientific endeavour. 

Science is, at its heart, a quest to know; to learn more about how the universe works. We challenge you to find a practice of discovery that has created a more reliable understanding of the physical world.

Admitting you don’t know is the first step to learning more – and this kind of honesty, which is embedded in scientific endeavour, underpins deep integrity, and rigorous systems designed to test, re-test and test again to ensure the advancement of scientific knowledge is based on fact, rather than assumption or wishful thinking.

The real meat of it is that science must be informed by evidence and peer review, two elements that are not negotiable. 

That’s why we’re so perplexed by recent attempts to discredit the integrity of scientists. 

All this, when the work of scientists is arguably subjected to greater rigor and scrutiny than any other professional group. Grant funding cannot be obtained without passing both a test of independent experts and political ‘national interest’ tests. Results cannot be published and promotion cannot be achieved without convincing an independent group of experts from around the world that the discovery you’ve made or the theory you’ve proven is as close to correct as it’s possible to be. And on the rare occasion that flawed findings make it through all those hoops and checks, there is no cover-up. Retractions are published, results are withdrawn – the word is spread. 

To berate science for identifying and rectifying its mistakes is to silence scientists. And that is deeply dangerous, because if we silence the people presenting rigorously-obtained new knowledge, then fear, myth, conjecture and assumption rush in to fill the gap.

Scientists and scientific institutions MUST be enabled to provide frank and fearless advice to government and to the public. Because when scientists are afraid of speaking up, people, economies and environments are put at risk. 

Does Australia really want a culture in which our strongest testers of the truth and our best chance of creating solutions to existential challenges are afraid to speak up? Where scientists working for national scientific institutions are publicly harassed after presenting their findings?

The people, and their political and business leadership, absolutely deserve to know. To know about the challenges they are facing, and to know about how to tackle them. We absolutely need a culture in which scientists are encouraged to share what they know with others, to provide frank and fearless advice to the government and to the people.

 

Professor Emma Johnston AO President, Science & Technology Australia

Dean of Science, University of NSW

 

Kylie Walker CEO, Science & Technology Australia

Share
advocacy government parliament science
Previous StorySTEM leaders urged to join STA Executive
Next StoryAustralia cannot afford to compromise the principles underpinning scientific research

Related Articles

  • 2022 STEM Ambassadors program open
    Step up as a STEM Ambassador
  • markus-spiske-IiEFmIXZWSw-unsplash
    Nominations open for the STA Policy Committee and Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Committee

ABOUT US

Science & Technology Australia (STA) is Australia’s peak body in science and technology. We represent more than 105,000 scientists and technologists. STA is an influential voice for evidence and expertise in public policy.

Recent news

  • Campus Plus, Science & Technology Australia and Cruxes Innovation to deliver industry PhD program
  • Meet the Mastermind Behind mRNA at Science Meets Parliament
  • MPs and Senators hear how batteries could power Australia’s economic future

Our members

  • All Members
  • Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Aquatic Sciences
  • Biological Sciences
  • Chemical Sciences
  • General Science and Technology
  • Geographical and Geological Sciences
  • Mathematical Sciences
  • Medical and Cognitive Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Plant and Ecological Sciences
  • Technological Sciences

Search for news

Most popular

  • Campus Plus, Science & Technology Australia and Cruxes Innovation to deliver industry PhD program
  • Meet Australia’s newest Superstars of STEM
  • Meet the Mastermind Behind mRNA at Science Meets Parliament
  • Commercialisation connector & research rockstar to lead STA
  • MPs and Senators hear how batteries could power Australia’s economic future

Sign up to our newsletter

STA PRIVACY POLICY

OTHER STA POLICIES

Twitter feed

  • Membership and events star? 💫 We have an incredible opportunity for you! Come work with the nation’s peak body for… https://t.co/Fmyke3styo
  • RT @DIP_SouthAust: A fantastic opportunity for engagement between the #STEM sectors and policymakers! Register before 27 January for Early…
  • RT @OzCvA: Early bird registration for the 2023 @ScienceAU Science Meets Parliament. Special rate until Fri 27 Jan 👇👇
  • RT @DSI_VIC: Expertise in #biotech, health, #genomics, #bioinformatics, synthetic biol, advanced manufacturing, ag, #biosecurity? Don't mis…
Follow us
The Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies (FASTS) trading as Science & Technology Australia (STA) is an association incorporated under the ACT Associations Act.

ABN 71 626 822 845
Registered charity logo
Click here for more info
  • HOME
  • News and media releases
  • Become a member
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Copyright © 2022 Science & Technology Australia. All Rights Reserved