Member Login - Account - Logout

Science and Technology Australia
  • Home
  • About STA
    • About Us
    • Executive and governance
    • Reconciliation Action Plan
    • Policy Vision
    • Policy Wins
    • Work for us
  • News and Publications
    • Latest news
    • Submissions, reports and publications
    • 2025 STA Federal Election Priorities
  • Our Programs
    • Science Meets Parliament
    • Superstars of STEM
    • Super STEM workshops
    • STEM Ambassadors
    • Parliamentary Friends of Science
    • Science Policy Fellows Alumni
  • STA Membership
    • STA Membership
    • Our Members
    • Member How-to Guides
    • Login to member portal
    • Register for member portal
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About STA
    • About Us
    • Executive and governance
    • Reconciliation Action Plan
    • Policy Vision
    • Policy Wins
    • Work for us
  • News and Publications
    • Latest news
    • Submissions, reports and publications
    • 2025 STA Federal Election Priorities
  • Our Programs
    • Science Meets Parliament
    • Superstars of STEM
    • Super STEM workshops
    • STEM Ambassadors
    • Parliamentary Friends of Science
    • Science Policy Fellows Alumni
  • STA Membership
    • STA Membership
    • Our Members
    • Member How-to Guides
    • Login to member portal
    • Register for member portal
  • Contact
16 September 2019

Separation of Science and the State

Brainstorming Word Meaning Creative Thinking And Ideas

There’s been a concerted effort over the last few months to point out that science isn’t perfect.

The National Party’s Federal Council has just endorsed a motion to establish a watchdog, a national scientific quality assurance agency –  a push led by federal MP George Christensen.

Nationals Senator Matt Canavan previously backed the call by the Queensland Liberal Party for an “Office of Science Quality Assurance” to review scientific reports before they are handed to government. It’s important to note there was no call for a review of all reports handed to government, only scientific ones.

We agree that science isn’t perfect, but it is a set of transparent methods for getting at the truth, and that’s the point. Imperfection and a desire for constant growth and improvement is the very thing that drives scientific endeavour. 

Science is, at its heart, a quest to know; to learn more about how the universe works. We challenge you to find a practice of discovery that has created a more reliable understanding of the physical world.

Admitting you don’t know is the first step to learning more – and this kind of honesty, which is embedded in scientific endeavour, underpins deep integrity, and rigorous systems designed to test, re-test and test again to ensure the advancement of scientific knowledge is based on fact, rather than assumption or wishful thinking.

The real meat of it is that science must be informed by evidence and peer review, two elements that are not negotiable. 

That’s why we’re so perplexed by recent attempts to discredit the integrity of scientists. 

All this, when the work of scientists is arguably subjected to greater rigor and scrutiny than any other professional group. Grant funding cannot be obtained without passing both a test of independent experts and political ‘national interest’ tests. Results cannot be published and promotion cannot be achieved without convincing an independent group of experts from around the world that the discovery you’ve made or the theory you’ve proven is as close to correct as it’s possible to be. And on the rare occasion that flawed findings make it through all those hoops and checks, there is no cover-up. Retractions are published, results are withdrawn – the word is spread. 

To berate science for identifying and rectifying its mistakes is to silence scientists. And that is deeply dangerous, because if we silence the people presenting rigorously-obtained new knowledge, then fear, myth, conjecture and assumption rush in to fill the gap.

Scientists and scientific institutions MUST be enabled to provide frank and fearless advice to government and to the public. Because when scientists are afraid of speaking up, people, economies and environments are put at risk. 

Does Australia really want a culture in which our strongest testers of the truth and our best chance of creating solutions to existential challenges are afraid to speak up? Where scientists working for national scientific institutions are publicly harassed after presenting their findings?

The people, and their political and business leadership, absolutely deserve to know. To know about the challenges they are facing, and to know about how to tackle them. We absolutely need a culture in which scientists are encouraged to share what they know with others, to provide frank and fearless advice to the government and to the people.

 

Professor Emma Johnston AO President, Science & Technology Australia

Dean of Science, University of NSW

 

Kylie Walker CEO, Science & Technology Australia

Share
advocacy government parliament science
Previous StorySTEM leaders urged to join STA Executive
Next StoryAustralia cannot afford to compromise the principles underpinning scientific research

Related Articles

  • Reef photo taken from above.
    Nominations open for the STA Policy Committee and Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Committee
  • 2022 STEM Ambassadors program open
    Step up as a STEM Ambassador

ABOUT US

Science & Technology Australia (STA) is Australia’s peak body in science and technology. We represent more than 235,000 scientists, engineers and technologists. STA is an influential voice for evidence and expertise in public policy.

Recent news

  • Honouring Indigenous Knowledge, Leadership, and Connection This NAIDOC Week
  • Research and innovation will lift Australia out of the productivity doldrums
  • Congratulations to STA President Sharath Sriram – new Chief Scientist of Western Australia

Our members

  • All Members
  • Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Aquatic Sciences
  • Biological Sciences
  • Chemical Sciences
  • General Science and Technology
  • Geographical and Geological Sciences
  • Mathematical Sciences
  • Medical and Cognitive Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Plant and Ecological Sciences
  • Technological Sciences

Search for news

Most popular

  • R&D investment a sure bet on the future
  • Congratulations to STA President Sharath Sriram – new Chief Scientist of Western Australia
  • Congratulations Labor – now let’s build an Australia powered by Australian ideas
  • Research and innovation will lift Australia out of the productivity doldrums
  • Nominations open: Join an STA Committee or the new Friends of the Chair initiative.

Sign up to our newsletter

Science and Technology Australia Limited (STA) (ACN 664 679 056 and ABN 71 626 822 845) is a company limited by guarantee. STA was formerly known as Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies Inc and was authorised under section 82 of the Associations Incorporation Act 1991 (ACT) to transfer its registration under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to its new company structure on 3 January 2023.

STA PRIVACY POLICY

OTHER STA POLICIES

ACNC Registered Charity Logo

Copyright © 2024 Science & Technology Australia. All Rights Reserved